Customers & brand

Customer satisfaction research: CSAT, NPS and CES programmes that lead to action

Customer satisfaction research measures how well your products and service meet customers' expectations, usually with CSAT, the Net Promoter Score (NPS) and the Customer Effort Score (CES). Beyond the scores, a sound study identifies which experiences drive satisfaction and loyalty, so you know which improvements will move the numbers and which unhappy customers need a call back now.

Typical timeline4–6 weeks
MethodsCAWI survey, CATI interviews, driver analysis, text analytics
FormatPDF report + data tables + presentation

Quick request

Leave your phone number and we will call to clarify the brief.

Your details are used only to answer your request. Privacy

Questions this report answers

  • How satisfied are customers overall, and has this changed since the last wave?
  • What is our NPS, and how does it vary by segment, product, branch or channel?
  • Which stages — onboarding, billing, delivery, support — drive recommendation most strongly?
  • How much effort does it take customers to get a problem solved?
  • Which dissatisfied customers are at risk of leaving, and why?
  • How do we compare with competitors on the attributes customers value?
  • Which improvements should come first, given their effect on loyalty?

When you need it

A satisfaction programme pays off when you have enough customers that you can no longer hear them all, and enough at stake that losing them hurts. Common triggers:

  • Churn or complaints are rising and internal reports cannot explain why.
  • Something changed in the operation: a new billing system, an app release, outsourced support or a merger of service teams.
  • Management wants customer KPIs in scorecards or bonus schemes, which requires a method robust enough to survive scrutiny.
  • You need a benchmark against competitors, which a survey of your own customers cannot provide on its own.

Two survey types serve different purposes. Relational surveys ask about the whole relationship once or twice a year; transactional surveys follow a specific interaction such as a delivery or a support call. Most organisations need both.

A satisfaction study is the wrong tool if you want to know why people never became customers; brand health tracking answers that. If the problem sits in one screen or form, UX research is faster. With only a handful of key accounts, structured interviews with each one beat a survey.

Sample table of contents

  1. Executive summary
    headline scores, key drivers, priority actions
  2. Methodology
    sample, response rate, fieldwork, weighting, margins of error
  3. Headline KPIs
    CSAT, NPS and CES with confidence intervals and trend
  4. Results by segment
    customer type, region, product, tenure and channel
  5. Touchpoint performance
    scores for each stage of the relationship
  6. Driver analysis
    importance against performance for every attribute
  7. Voice of the customer
    coded open answers and sentiment by theme
  8. Competitive benchmark
    where a market sample is included
  9. Customers at risk
    profile of detractors and stated intention to leave
  10. Action plan
    prioritised improvements with owners and target KPIs

Methodology and sources

Measures

CSAT uses a five-point satisfaction scale. Net Promoter Score asks how likely customers are to recommend you on a 0–10 scale; promoters answer 9–10, detractors 0–6, and NPS is the percentage of promoters minus the percentage of detractors, from −100 to +100. Customer effort score asks how easy it was to get an issue handled, typically on a seven-point scale. Attribute ratings per touchpoint and one or two open questions complete the survey.

Sampling

Your CRM is the sampling frame. Relational waves use a random or stratified sample; transactional surveys are triggered after an interaction. Invitations go by email or SMS, with CATI for customers without email and for B2B decision-makers. We compare respondents with non-respondents on CRM variables to check for non-response bias and weight where needed.

Analysis

Driver analysis, using regression or relative-importance methods, shows which attributes move overall satisfaction and NPS. Changes between waves are tested for significance before anyone celebrates. Open answers are coded with text analytics and checked by an analyst.

Closing the loop

The ICC/ESOMAR International Code requires research to be kept distinct from non-research activities, so respondents are only re-contacted about their feedback if they have explicitly agreed. That alert list is handled under GDPR.

What you receive

  • Wave report and presentation with KPI trends and driver analysis
  • Excel tables by segment, region, product and channel
  • Coded verbatims with theme frequencies and examples
  • Secure alert list of detractors who agreed to be contacted
  • Dashboard refreshed after each wave
  • Action-planning workshop with process owners

How the project runs

  1. Objectives, KPI definitions and sample design — 1 week
  2. Questionnaire, invitation texts and pilot — 1 week
  3. Fieldwork for a relational wave — 1–2 weeks
  4. Analysis and driver modelling — 1 week
  5. Report and workshop — 3–5 days
  6. Repeat waves quarterly or half-yearly, or run continuous transactional tracking
Hypothetical example for illustration

Worked example

Example: a hypothetical retail bank with a mobile app and a branch network sees current-account closures creeping up. Branch managers blame waiting times; the digital team blames competitors' sign-up offers.

The bank commissions a relational survey of customers stratified by product and tenure, plus a transactional CES survey after every card dispute and complaint. Driver analysis shows that the way card disputes are handled affects the likelihood of recommending the bank far more than branch queues. Customers who raised a dispute report high effort, and their comments repeat one theme: having to explain the problem again to every new person.

The bank appoints a single case owner for each dispute, lets customers upload evidence in the app and tracks CES after every resolved case. Detractors who consented are called back within two working days. The next quarterly wave tests whether the dispute score and the overall NPS have moved beyond the margin of error.

Common mistakes and how to avoid them

  • Chasing the score instead of the reasons. NPS alone does not tell you what to fix; always pair it with drivers and open questions.
  • Letting staff choose who is surveyed. Selection by front-line teams inflates scores; sample from the CRM automatically.
  • Reading noise as change. A few points of NPS movement on a small sample may be random; report confidence intervals.
  • Comparing scores across countries without context. Response styles differ between cultures, so compare trends within a market first.
  • Tying bonuses to raw scores. It invites score-begging; combine KPIs with audits and verbatim reviews.

Who it suits

Suitable forWhy
Banks, insurers and utilitiesLarge customer bases, regulated complaint handling and costly churn
Telecoms and subscription businessesEvery renewal decision makes dissatisfaction visible in revenue
SaaS companiesAccount-level NPS and support CES help customer success teams prioritise
Retailers and e-commerce businessesDelivery and returns experiences can be tracked by store or carrier
B2B service providersAnnual reviews capture both decision-makers and daily users

Frequently asked questions

Should we use CSAT, NPS or CES?

They answer different questions. CSAT measures satisfaction with a specific experience, NPS captures overall loyalty and willingness to recommend, and CES shows how easy you are to deal with after a problem. Most programmes use NPS for the relationship and CSAT or CES for individual touchpoints.

How long does a satisfaction study take, and how often should we repeat it?

The first relational wave usually takes four to six weeks, including questionnaire design and a pilot. After that, waves run quarterly or every six months, and transactional surveys can report monthly. Repeating too often without acting on results only tires customers.

How many responses do we need?

Around 385 completes give ±5 points at 95% confidence for a percentage such as "satisfied". NPS is the difference of two shares, so its interval is wider and needs larger samples for reliable comparisons. Try our NPS calculator to see how sample size affects the result.

What affects the cost of a satisfaction programme?

The main factors are the number of waves or the length of continuous tracking, the interview mode, sample size per segment, the number of countries and languages, whether a competitor benchmark is included and the depth of dashboarding. Describe your set-up and request a quote.

Can respondents stay anonymous, and how do you handle our customer data?

Yes. By default, answers are reported only in aggregate. We process your customer list under a data processing agreement, use it only for the survey and delete it afterwards. Individual feedback is passed back only for customers who explicitly agree, as GDPR and the ICC/ESOMAR Code require.

Can you benchmark us against competitors?

Yes, but not from your own customer list. A benchmark needs a market sample of customers of each competitor, usually drawn from an online panel with the same questions. Mystery shopping adds an independent view of service delivery, and customer journey research explains where scores are won or lost.

Related reports

Sources

Updated: 5 Nov 2026

Tell us what you need to find out

No subscription, no commitment. We send a tailored proposal with scope, method and timeline.

Request a proposal →
  • No price lists — a proposal built around your question
  • Proposal within 1 working day
  • Bulgarian, English and Dutch
Free proposal